Full Specification Sheet · Methodology & Sources

Have we found quantum advantage? The five-scoreboard answer

Nature Campaign summary (5 scoreboards) Hardware IBM Heron · 2026 campaign Experiments ~110 · F01–F118 Every number a job ID
◇ FOUND ON FOUR OF FIVE · theorem ceilings cleared 21σ to 341σ

↓ Read this sheet as plain-text Markdown

This is the methodology sheet behind the visual scoreboard. The exhibit answers one question — have we found quantum advantage? — across five scoreboards, each cleared against an exact theorem ceiling, and it states plainly what is not claimed. Every σ below is transcribed verbatim from the exhibit (the tiles and the enumerated rows array); nothing is invented. Sources in §5.

1The verdict, in one line

Yes — measurably, on four of five scoreboards, against exact theorem ceilings cleared by 21σ to 341σ. On the fifth — computational — the wall against a brute-force speedup is measured (F54), and the constant-depth solver that the only depth-separation theorem is built on now runs on silicon at 90%. No shortcut is claimed that the hardware does not hold.

2The five scoreboards

3The theorem ceilings — clearance over the classical / theorem bound

Each headline clears an exact, pre-registered bound. The flagship σ values, transcribed from the exhibit's enumerated table with the null each is measured against:

Campaign headline clearances over classical theorem bounds across five scoreboards
scoreboard headlineclearanceover the bound
Superdense coding341σover 0.5 (unassisted)
Causal-order game216.8σover 0.8695 (SDP)
Magic-square contextuality196σover 8/9 (enumerated)
GHZ metrology168σover executed SQL
One-sided-DI steering96σover LHS bound 1
Capacity activation55.6σover 0
Negative conditional entropy42σS(B|A) < 0
ICO refrigeration21.1σover 0

The through-line

The classical hardness of the computational problem (F113) is the magic-square contextuality (F106), certified at 196σ — the correlation advantage and the computational instrument are the same resource. (The Race-6 runtime claim that briefly sat on this scoreboard was superseded by our own red-team pre-submission, C4996 — see the exhibit.)

4What is NOT claimed

The boundary column — each an explicit limit printed on the exhibit:

No brute-force speedup — F54's 10× depth wall, measured. No on-chip QNC⁰≠NC⁰ proof — the separation is asymptotic; the apparatus is real. No loophole-free device-independence — the randomness certificate (F117, 0.65 bit/use) is one-sided-DI; locality open. Same Heron generation only — a cross-generation exam is the harder unclaimed test.

5Sources & provenance

Back to the interactive scoreboard